Rule 5.4 Professional Independence of a Lawyer

  • Home
  • Rule 5.4 Professional Independence of a Lawyer
Diversity

Florida Legal Ethics Update: From Questioning Diversity Quotas to Proposals for a Regulatory Sandbox and More

Florida CLE Diversity Controversy The Florida Supreme Court attracted national attention when it recently sua sponte changed the CLE programming requirements such that The Florida Bar cannot approve CLE programming and Florida lawyers cannot receive CLE credits for attendance at any program for which there was a diversity requirement or quota pertaining to the selection ...
Read more

communication

California May Join Utah in the Sandbox: Working Group Empowered to Explore Innovation in the Delivery of Legal Services

Last week the California State Bar Board of Trustees voted to move forward with the exploration of a regulatory sandbox approach.
Read more

Future

Utah Advances the Conversation: Future of Lawyering to Include NonLawyers?

The Utah Supreme Court recently posted its Standing Order 15 and proposed amendments to its Rules of Professional Conduct 5.4 (Professional Independence of a Lawyer) and 1.5 (Attorney Fees), which pave the way for collaboration between lawyers and non-lawyers to both provide legal services and share revenue. Future
Read more