Legal Ethics In Motion logo

BLOG

Attorneys Entitled to Fees Despite Allegations of Rate Increases and Estimate Overruns
Attorneys Entitled to Fees Despite Allegations of Rate Increases and Estimate OverrunsDecember 13, 2016In August, the Connecticut Superior Court held that a law firm accused of failing to notify its litigation clients of rate increases and estimate overruns may still recover its legal fees. AttorneysRead More

No Love for Lawyer Who Reported Ethics Violation for Personal Benefit
No Love for Lawyer Who Reported Ethics Violation for Personal BenefitDecember 8, 2016An attorney who agreed to a fee-sharing agreement with his former firm tried to void the arrangement by claiming that there was a conflict of interest between his former firm and defendant, the Board of Education of the City of Buffalo. LoveRead More

Virginia: Conflict of Interest & Importance of Public Confidence Precludes Law Firm From Lobbying General Assembly
Virginia: Conflict of Interest & Importance of Public Confidence Precludes Law Firm From Lobbying General AssemblyDecember 6, 2016The Virginia State Bar recently opined that lawyer-legislator status creates a conflict of interest such that not only is the lawyer precluded from lobbying the legislative body of which he is a member, but so too are all the other members of the consulting firm of which he is a member and law firm that owns the consulting firm.Read More

Third Ethics Panel Dings Avvo’s Matching for Legal Services
Third Ethics Panel Dings Avvo’s Matching for Legal ServicesNovember 1, 2016Avvo Legal Services is offering a matching program to connect potential clients with lawyers. The program provides lawyers with the opportunity to offer legal services directly to consumers after a fixed price consultation. EthicsRead More

New York City Bar: Prosecutors’ Duty to Disclose Held Broader Than Brady Standard
New York City Bar: Prosecutors’ Duty to Disclose Held Broader Than Brady StandardOctober 26, 2016According to a recent opinion from the New York City Bar’s Ethics Committee, a prosecutor’s ethical obligation to disclose evidence favorable to a defendant is broader than the constitutional minimums imposed by the Supreme Court in Brady v. Maryland.Read More

“Attorney’s Eyes Only”
“Attorney’s Eyes Only”October 22, 2016Court orders imposing “attorney’s eyes only” discovery restrictions do not disrupt the attorney-client relationship or contradict an attorney’s ethical duty to keep clients informed, according to the District Court for the Southern District of Florida.Read More

Feuding Directors Can Access Privileged Communications Under Delaware Law
Feuding Directors Can Access Privileged Communications Under Delaware LawOctober 20, 2016 A company’s directors have the right under Delaware law to access all corporate attorney-client communications originated during their terms as directors—even if their interests in the current suit are adverse to the company itself.Read More

Mississippi Court of Appeals: A Bar Complaint Does not  Toll the Statute of Limitations on a  Legal Malpractice Claim
Mississippi Court of Appeals: A Bar Complaint Does not Toll the Statute of Limitations on a Legal Malpractice ClaimOctober 15, 2016The Mississippi Court of Appeals recent decision in Archer v. Creefound holds that a client’s state bar complaint against a lawyer does not toll the statute of limitations on that client’s legal malpractice claim.Read More

Avvo’s Directory Akin to the Yellow Pages: Embedded Attorney Advertising Does Not Render a Profile Listing to be Commercial Speech
Avvo’s Directory Akin to the Yellow Pages: Embedded Attorney Advertising Does Not Render a Profile Listing to be Commercial SpeechOctober 12, 2016On September 12, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois ruled in Vrdolyak v. Avvo, Inc. that Avvo’s publishing of online profiles of Illinois attorneys, which may contain advertisements for competing attorneys on the same page,  does not violate an individual attorney's publicity rights. AdvertisingRead More

Equity Stake Isn’t a Prerequisite for ‘Partner’ Label
Equity Stake Isn’t a Prerequisite for ‘Partner’ LabelOctober 9, 2016May a law firm refer to its lawyers, as partners, when those lawyers do not have voting authority on corporate governance matters or equity shares in the firm? The North Carolina State Bar recently answered this question in the affirmative.Read More

Categories

Controversial Tweet and Social Media

Another Controversial Tweet, Another Lawyer Facing Career Repercussions

Controversial tweets and posts about current events on various social media platforms has resulted in career repercussions for many lawyers and judges. Whether it is loss of employment, a judicial reprimand, or a suspension—It is a fact of our digital existence that lawyers and judges posting controversial tweets or posts about current events may suffer damage to their careers. ...

Chatting and texting

“Chatting” or Texting with Clients During Their Testimony Led 2 Attorneys to No More Chatting or Texting with Any Clients

Arizona Attorney Suspended for Coaching Client During Virtual Cross-Examination Florida Attorney Suspended for Texting Client During a Telephonic Deposition By Jan L. Jacobowitz and Lauren Maier Chatting, texting, and suspensions, Oh My! There seems to be no number of times that is too many to remind lawyers that the legal ethics rules continue to apply ...

selective focus photo of lensball on asphalt road

Crystal Ball Conflicts? Nevada Issues 1.7 Advice on Advance Conflict Waivers

Advance Conflict Waivers–Viable or Problematic? In 2021, the State Bar of Nevada Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility published Formal Opinion No. 58, addressing the permissibility of prospective conflict waivers (also known as “future conflict waivers” or “advance conflict waivers”) under Nevada Rule of Professional Conduct 1.7 Under Nevada Rule 1.7(b), a client may ...

Client Dishonesty

Client Lies at a Deposition–What’s a Lawyer to Do?

Client Lies: Texas Bar Issues Opinion 692 to Address A Lawyer’s Responsibility A client lies during a deposition. The lawyer know…what should the lawyer do? Recently, the Professional Ethics Committee for the State Bar of Texas published Opinion No. 692, regarding a lawyer’s requirement to correct false statements made by the lawyer’s client during a deposition ...

probate

S.C. Probate Judge Under Fire Again for Facebook Posts

Although not an attorney, a South Carolina probate judge’s social media use constituted impermissible judicial conduct A South Carolina probate judge has had a second run-in with the state supreme court for impermissible social media posts. In an order published on October 13, 2021, the South Carolina Supreme Court issued Judge Kenneth “Kenny” E. Johns, ...

Client with Diminished Capacity

Improving Attorney-Client Communication: ABA Formal Opinion 500

The ABA provides guidance on how to navigate attorney-client communication obstacles, such as language barriers Lawyers unsure about their client’s ability to understand their case or their attorney’s advice should hire a translator to avoid possible communication pitfalls, according to the American Bar Association’s (“ABA”) newly issued Formal Opinion 500, Language Access in the Client-Lawyer ...

Florida

Florida Supreme Court: Ticket Defense App Is Engaged in The Unlicensed Practice of Law

In a controversial decision, Florida’s highest court held that a nonlawyer ticket defense app was providing legal services In a 4-3 decision, the Florida Supreme Court held that TIKD, a traffic ticket defense app, was engaged in the unlicensed practice of law (“UPL”). In doing so, the court declined to adopt the referee’s recommendation of ...

pro se attorney

Pro Se Attorney Under Fire in Illinois for Provocative Statements During His Divorce Proceedings

Pro Se Attorney’s Offensive Statements to Judge and Opposing Counsel Result in Disciplinary Case A pro se Des Plaines, Illinois attorney had a run-in with the Illinois Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission (“IARDC”) after making provocative statements while representing himself in divorce proceedings initiated by his estranged wife. The complaint, filed by the IARDC on ...

social media

New Jersey Issues a Social Media Mulligan, But Warns Lawyers that Social Media Competence is Required

Social Media Savvy Required for Lawyers The Supreme Court of New Jersey issued an order in which it declined to impose discipline on an attorney for his improper use of Facebook in 2007.  The decision stems from events that began in 2007, when attorney John Robertelli, according to  the Supreme Court of New Jersey Opinion, ...

Passive Investment in ABS

ABA Opinion 499 Green Lights Lawyers’ Passive Investment in Firms with NonLawyer Ownership

Despite ABA Green Light, States May Not Embrace Passive Investment in Alternative Business Structures An Alternative Business Structure (“ABS”) that permits lawyers and nonlawyers to collaborate and share revenue has become a hot, revolutionary topic in the rapidly evolving practice of law.  In fact, Arizona has deleted Rule 5.4, which prohibits lawyers from being in ...

Remote Work

Remote Work: San Francisco Bar Association Advice in Ethics Opinion 2021-1

The Remote Work Discussion Continues The Bar Association of San Francisco recently released Ethics Opinion 2021-1, addressing whether lawyers who practice law remotely from another jurisdiction where they are not licensed are engaging in the unauthorized practice of law. The Opinion comes on the heels of the State Bar of California Standing Committee on Professional ...

Data

Loss of 22 Terabytes of Police Data Shakes the City of Dallas’ Criminal Courts

Data Loss and Cybersecurity Remain Top Priorities for Legal Profession A massive amount of police data was lost in a City of Dallas file transfer, but then more missing data was discovered. Although in a different context, this is yet another reminder for law firms and attorneys generally to implement and revise data maintenance and ...

Controversial Tweet and Social Media

First Amendment v. Judicial Canons Part 2

Another Georgia Judge Defending Her Social Media Posts As Compliant with Judicial Canons The Judicial Canons and social media are once again the focus of judicial woes in Georgia. On July 22, the Georgia Judicial Qualifications Commission (JQC) filed formal charges against Douglas County Probate Judge Christina Peterson, accusing the Judge of four counts of ...

First Amendment

Judicial Misconduct or First Amendment Expression?

Georgia Judge Asserting First Amendment Rights in Defending Allegation of Ethics Violations After Controversial Facebook Post A judge in Cherokee County, Georgia, has been charged with ethics violations after posting support for the Cherokee County Sheriff’s Office spokesperson who made controversial comments about Robert Aaron Long, the man accused of killing eight people at three ...

woman standing near the kitchen counter with her laptop open on table

Delaware Green Lights Remote Work in Formal Opinion 2021-1

Delaware Lawyers: Remote Work Okay If State of Residence Agrees Last month, the Delaware State Bar Association Committee on Professional Ethics released Formal Opinion 2021-1, addressing whether Delaware attorneys may practice Delaware law while working remotely from another jurisdiction. The Committee held that Delaware licensed lawyers are permitted to practice Delaware law outside the state, ...

Client with Diminished Capacity

Clients Illegal Activity: Colorado Bar Admonishes “Willful Blindness” But Departs from ABA Op. 491 “Should Know” Standard

Counseling Clients and Illegal Activity Under Rule 1.2          On July 10, 2021, the Colorado Bar Association Ethics Committee released a new opinion regarding Colorado Rule of Professional Conduct 1.2(d), analyzing a lawyer’s duty to inquire about a client’s illegal activity. Under 1.2(d), which sets a similar standard to Model Rule 1.2(d), lawyers “shall not ...

remote work

Care to Comment? California Issues Interim Formal Opinion 20-0004 on Remote Work

California Formal Opinion Interim No. 20-0004 on Remote Work Yesterday, the the State Bar of California Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct posted Formal Opinion No. 20-0004 on remote work for comment. The opinion acknowledges the increase of attorneys remotely working driven both by technology and external circumstances that include Covid-19 and natural disasters ...

Cannibis

Cannabis Advice for Lawyers: New York and Georgia on Different Ends of the Spectrum

The legal landscape of medical and recreational marijuana remains fast-changing across the United States–cannabis remains illegal under federal law—and there are inconsistencies among various states’ legal ethics advice regarding whether lawyers may represent clients involved in the cannabis industry. On June 21, 2021, the Supreme Court of Georgia denied a motion to amend Rule 1.2 ...

Suspension

A Series of Unfortunate Events: Giuliani’s New York Law License Suspension

Giuliani Interim Suspension I did not rush out of the gate to discuss the extremely well publicized (See, for example, NPR, CNN, NYT, and Forbes) interim suspension of Rudy Giuliani’s New York law license or the reciprocal interim suspension imposed the District of Columbia. There has been so much coverage that I found it interesting ...

Social Media

More Social Media Trouble in the Legal Profession: South Carolina Orders 6 Month Suspension for Incendiary Facebook Posts

Social media update… A(nother) lawyer recently made the news for a suspension based on controversial Facebook posts. The South Carolina Supreme Court decision suspending the lawyer for six months based upon twelve offensive posts on Facebook found that the lawyer’s conduct brought the legal profession into disrepute and violated both the letter and spirit of ...

Diversity

Florida Legal Ethics Update: From Questioning Diversity Quotas to Proposals for a Regulatory Sandbox and More

Florida CLE Diversity Controversy The Florida Supreme Court attracted national attention when it recently sua sponte changed the CLE programming requirements such that The Florida Bar cannot approve CLE programming and Florida lawyers cannot receive CLE credits for attendance at any program for which there was a diversity requirement or quota pertaining to the selection ...

Sanctions for profanity

Profanity is Costly: Lawyer Sanctioned for Conduct Unbecoming and F*** You

Florida Federal Court Imposes Sanctions for Profanity and Unprofessionalism Three depositions, two lawyers, and one court reporter…what could go “wrong?” Apparently, conduct by all three that included one lawyer telling the other lawyer to, “Shut the f*** up.” The dispute seems to have exploded after one lawyer, Mr. “K” objected to the use of the ...

First Amendment

HawkLaw Attorney Advertising Being Preyed Upon By South Carolina Bar Authorities?

First Amendment v Attorney Advertising Regulation The internet’s low cost and ease of advertising has increased the focus on the tension between the state regulation of attorney advertising and attorneys’ First Amendment right to commercial speech that was  established by the US Supreme Court in Bates v Arizona in 1977. The latest episode is taking ...

super lawyer

Gig’s Up in NJ: Are You Really a #1, Super, Duper, Top-Rated, Best Lawyer?

The New Jersey Supreme Court’s Committee on Attorney Advertising Demands Verifiable “Super” Awards and Honors Last week New Jersey’s Supreme Court Committee on Attorney Advertising issued a notice cautioning lawyers that terms like “super,” “top,” “best,” and “rising star” that may be awarded to lawyers by various organizations may only be used in advertising if ...

Online vitriol

Dealing with Online Vitriol: Florida Bar to Consider Amending The Confidentiality Rule 4-1.6

Online Vitriol: Amending Confidentiality Rule 4-1.6 and Proposed Opinion 21-1 on Third Party Criticism At its recent meeting, The Florida Bar’s Professional Ethics Committee approved an amendment to Florida Bar Rule 4-1.6 Confidentiality that would provide a limited exception to permit lawyers to respond when they suffer an online vitriol attack from a former client ...

Lawyer Well-Being

What Does Lawyer Well-Being 2021 Have to Do With Legal Ethics?

Explore Lawyer Well-Being Week, May 3rd, for the Answers Lawyer Well-Being and Legal Ethics The answer to the question falls into the category of “everything.”  Why? It has been well-documented that not only does the legal profession suffer a disproportionately high statistical evidence of stress, depression, suicide, substance abuse, and other mental well-being challenges, but ...

judges

Judges on Facebook 2.0—California Offers New Advice

California Opinion 2021-42  Provides Advice for Judges Commenting on Law Related Topics The California Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions (“Committee”) issued Expedited Opinion 2021-42 yesterday to provide additional guidance to judges who want to make statements on Facebook concerning “legislation related to the law, the legal system, and the administration of justice.” The ...

Geo-fencing

Geo-Fencing: Abusive or Astute Attorney Advertising?

New Jersey Opinion 46 Addresses Geo-Fencing Lawyers have discovered the electronic marketing techniques referred to as geo-fencing or geo-targeting and have inquired about the propriety of their use in attorney advertising.  The New Jersey Committee on Attorney Advertising has recently responded in Opinion 46 with guidance that permits geo-fencing with specific limitations. A bit of ...

Disclosing

Disclosing Information to Prevent Danger: When Your Clients are Those Who Contribute to Climate Change

Attorneys who represent greenhouse gas emitters are finding themselves battling their own legal and ethical risks, as some states are considering an attorney’s knowledge of greenhouse gas emissions to fall under the confidentiality exception that permits disclosure of confidential information when it could prevent death or substantial bodily danger. Disclosing

Societies

New Guidelines Address Federal Judges’ Affiliation with Liberal and Conservative Societies

An ethics opinion drafted by the Committee on Codes of Conduct of the U.S. Judicial Conference in January 2020 states that federal judges should refrain from becoming formally affiliated—either through membership or leadership roles—with the conservative Federalist Society and the liberal American Constitution Society. Societies